Image + Words

EVENING

Oil on canvas, c. 54” x 48”
Private collection

Light. Shadow.  If not suspicion, skepticism.  Maybe this is the story: A man telling a story or making a case. She doesn’t believe him. Or she wonders about his motives. Her younger sister won’t step in unless she has to. Maybe I have the story wrong.  Maybe the story is of a metaphysical nature, the reality of the dried and maybe dying flowers asserting more reality and reason to be believed than the people, who have bent to a social definition of life.  Saturation.  The paint is heavy and thick.  Three figures on a terrace. Lungotevere delle Armi. Evening sets in.  The two sisters.  A man who is visiting.

As in a 17th century genre painting of a visiting soldier trying to charm or seduce a servant girl. Flowers, selected by the light. A fallen petal.  A yellow wall.  The sky is growing dark but saturated with a dense heavy light.  Cobalt blue. No actual realism. Orange, green and violet entangle in the shadows.  The day ends in an eternal transitory moment where a gesture persists. A floral pattern on the cushions on the chair.  A wine glass upright there and another placed upside down here, nearer us.  Over there an embroidery hoop, beside a boxed sewing kit with needles, pins and spools of colored floss. Close to us, sharing the light on the flowers, the top of a jar, unscrewed from the absent jar, removed and overturned, corralling a single nail, a black iron tack.

DRIFT

oil on canvas, 68” x 72”
Private collection

There are so many inspiring paintings of bathers, from Renoir to The Death of Marat; Degas to a particular early Blue Period Picasso; to Wayne Thiebaud, Bonnard, Rembrandt’s Hendrickje Stoffels lifting her dressing gown to step into water, Antonio Lopez Garcia.  More than anything for this picture, the prose poems of Paul Valery inspire it, not so much the one titled, The Bath as the one titled Laura.  And also the cyberneticians, whose thoughts were hanging around me at the time like paper lanterns,  describe actions as planned and unplanned, as steering and drifting. When I began this painting I was under the sway of Humberto Maturana’s talk about drift. In a context of human action, in the process of unconsciously drifting in life and in thought. 

 

And then too,  the invitation to drowsiness and forgetting arising from the heat of the bath, the solitude (which is so important to Laura who may not otherwise appear), the bath as a place of escape from the world, a shrine, of deep mental quiet, purposeless wandering of thought into its extinction in the vagaries of poetic weather. Vagaries. The color pink, or rose, the chair where an absent witness sits, or once sat, which is now a rack, the bra over the back of it, a casual trace of ceremonial undressing, the least generous of tributes to clothing.

Here where sacred and profane love form into one, the ideal detaching from the objects of the world: this exact hairbrush, this squeezed washcloth, its color escaping its form, that exact carpet, its sequence of colored stripes, a charm bracelet, how it fell as it fell, and felt slippers on the floor, as they were stepped out if, the labor of those that built the room, tiled it and put in the plumbing, everything suspended between being remembered and being forgotten.

COMMON COLD

acrylic on canvas, 68” x 72”

Sick in bed.  A girl.  About ten.  Twelve? Greta.  A flannel robe, slippers with big fluorescent targets on them, a television, a phone, the assembled needs of the patient on a table from Ikea.  Decorations in the room.  Glass animals on a shelf.  This is not a painting of those terribly sick or injured people, Munch’s sister for instance, or the invalid Monet painted by Renoir, or of the consequence of terrible illness Monet’s sick wife succumbing to death, or Picasso’s candle-lit friend, of Jesus in the tomb.  No.  That gravity is lifted. This girl will get better, but she, like all of us, will get another cold someday, thought what she’ll watch on television won’t be the same Our Gang comedy that passes the time from its place on the floor, with Darla and Buckwheat who’ve all grown up and died from something other than a cold by the time the girl in the painting watches it with hardly a scrap of attention at the time the sickness was on her and this painting was made.  A technical note: This painting is done using glow-in-the-dark paint as well as the usual colors, and is built to function day and night, visible twenty-four hours a day, as a tireless full-service painting.

JUNK

acrylic on canvas, c. 100” x 68”

I had an inspiration going downhill on Midvale Avenue around seven to do some paintings while I was driving one Wednesday evening to Frank Hyder’s studio in Northern Liberties to draw from the model with him and with Tina Newberry and occasional others while listening to Enigma, which seemed more or less to be some guy and his girlfriend making techno-wall-of-sound music out of next to nothing but a bunch of electronic equipment in a garage, thus we are known to ourselves thereafter (if to nobody else), as the Enigma Group.  Some of these drawings were good, and one of mine hangs in Harvey Horowitz’s house, of a standing woman painted in ink washes, and year by year this large drawing fades a little more from the sun.

When this inspiration struck, I pulled over and sketched out about twenty paintings which I would paint in the following year.  Three of these were Junk, Trash, and Garbage.  This one is Junk.  I painted this on Maplewood Avenue with the help of Nancy No, who was my peerless studio assistant in the days when I made it, and we had fun pouring out some early big, thick, murky parts on the canvas flat on the floor to get this painting going. Junk is a large painting, painted in two parts that are joined together.  It is made to be a vertical painting, but it also looks good sideways, which is how it is alternately presented on the website.

There seem to be tributes to Anselm Keifer and Julian Schabel in this painting, in the blackish mire (Kiefer) and broken dishes (Schnabel), but this painting is on its own, not trying to be anyone else’s painting, and it is not about anything to the exclusion of anything else, except to the inevitability of junk, of everything becoming junk, with a lot of unconscious inspiration going, of unconscious meaning prevailing, that is percolating through mere felt excuses for its existence into a solid reality, with meanings arising as it goes, the last being the unhinged door which, at the bottom, begins to refer to itself  without even trying, as the lid of a sepulcher.

One of the finest bits of Beatle-wisdom is in Paul McCartney’s inspirational song Sing-along Junk which answers “Buy, buy, says the shop window,” with, “Why? Why? says the junk in the yard.”

SUMMER AT EMMAUS

oil on canvas, 66”x 48”

She is bereft it seems.  Desolate   This painting meditates on a long wait.

An uncertain future will resolve itself.  There can be this hope. But the resolution grows more intangible as time goes on.  It extends through the summer.  Some aching promise might or might not be fulfilled. Someone or something might betray her. Is the mere discomfort of waiting a betrayal in itself?  or a test? And if a test a test of what?  Faith? Patience?  Endurance?  Painting is comfortable with uncertainty.  Its development over time is a sequence of decisions which are most often impossible decisions.  A sequence of undecidable that must be decided for the painting to go on. Occasional clear improvements, occasional certain mistakes. The rest provisional. Painting takes a slanted view. It doesn’t mind living without knowing. It takes its time. Every painting is an unknown thing through all its life of creation.  When it is finished is it merely abandoned as some painters say? Etched on the glass beside her is an image from a Pompeiian wall, a view of Primavera, walking away from us.  

What does she carry in her basket? Is she a reflection of the figure in the painting, or her opposite? What does it mean to walk through glass?  Does she go anywhere at all, or nowhere.  Does she promise anything?  Is she a promise? As to the figure: why is she in profile, why are her knees as they are.  Are those sandals, the design of those sandals, meaningful?  Each of the flowers?  The evidence of construction and carpentry? Tools. Is this too casual an approach to iconology? This is a symbolist painting we must suppose, because, as a unity, it reflects and projects an emotional or psychological state that could be said to be specific and unique. A shell.  A pebble. An empty bottle. The light that falls.  Everything expresses this state.

Algebra
1990 12 x 16”
oil,wax, and Wissahickon mica on canvas
Currently in “Bright and Beautiful” ongoing exhibition Woodmere Museum Philadelphia

 

The mica was collected around the from the steepest slopes along Wissahickon Creek,  and under the Walnut Avenue bridge.  The mica was cleaved from chunks. 

I had been doing figure paintings, many of my daughter Greta and her friends.  This painting shows Greta doing her algebra homework. She is seen in a three quarter view from the back, and wearing what she happened to be wearing when I asked her to pose – hooded sweatshirt, LA Angels baseball cap, fly-girl earrings.   The over-the-shoulder seen-from-the-back pose was partly inspired by Dali’s several paintings of Gala seen from behind, and particularly from the 1930’s when he and Gala had left Paris to live in a claustrophobic fisherman’s shack, both intimate and alienated , cut off from society, in an abstract space like the abstract mental space of mathematics.

 

 The etheric cogged wheels turning mechanically, is like her thinking, projected into space. The color is saturated, the hat and earrings, and even the wheels in space in front to Greta’s face, are not chosen or symbolic in intention, but seem to accrue meaning on their own.  In retrospect, I’d say that this painting is more than anything, a symbolist work, in the psychological pre-expressionist sense of the work of the Symbolist movement. 

The use of the mica proceeds from my dissatisfaction with the physical accessibility of the surface of my paintings to the viewer. I was dissatisfied with the relationship between illusion and accessibility.  Thee painting is protected or absolved from sharing too much its space with the space of the viewer.